As an American, your States are your Nations.

As an American, you have an identity as a New Yorker, Washingtonian, Texan, or, like me, as a Wisconsinite.

Each American State is the equivalent of a small country, with all the rights and prerogatives of a small country.

These inherent sovereign rights of our States were somewhat changed early on in our country’s history because the Founders realized the value of working together to provide a mutual defense system, a common currency and postal service, and, in the end, eighteen enumerated services and functions that were identified and delegated to our Federal Subcontractors.

The “powers” of each of the individual states related to these functions were relinquished and combined and entrusted to the Federal Government.

That Government consisted of three separate Service Providers, one American, one British Territorial, and one Holy Roman Empire provider. As the American Subcontractor was never reconstructed after the Civil War, there are only two Federal Subcontractors still functioning.

In the absence of the American Subcontractor or any other Federal Subcontractor, the Delegation of Powers reverts to the Delegator — our Federation of States.

Absolutely all of the “enumerated powers” granted to the Federal Subcontractors exist in international and global jurisdictions that are foreign to the national jurisdiction of our States.

Thus, the Federal Government operates in and provides services in a foreign capacity, and Federal Employees, be they Americans or anyone else, are obligated to work in these foreign jurisdictions and obey the foreign laws that apply to them.

This presented a problem. How can Americans work in and under the demands of a foreign jurisdiction and be subject to its foreign laws and governments —-and still be protected under the Constitutions that apply to Americans?

Dual Federal Citizenship was born.
This political status allows a Federal Employee to claim citizenship or nationality from two (2) governments at the same time. And they get to choose which governments.

Thus, as a Federal Employee or Dependent, you could choose to adopt a Dual Citizenship that recognized you as a Texan and as a U.S. Citizen (British Territorial). Your status as a Texan would then enable you to claim the protections and guarantees of the Federal Constitution, and at the same time, obligate you to act as a faithful Subject of the Queen.

This is exactly the political status that David Straight is promoting. If you adopt Dual Federal Citizenship you can act as both an American State National (a Texan, for example) and as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen.

This protects your constitutional guarantees as a Texan and also allows you to function as a British Subject, with whatever benefits that may imply.

There is just one problem with this. If everyone does it, there is nobody home running the State Government of Texas, and without Texas, the Constitutions are “vacated” and you are reduced to being a Territorial Subject of the Queen —- right back where we all were when the Colonists first took up arms.

Some of us have to bear the honor and the burden of being Americans and nothing but Americans. We have to protect and defend the Constitutions against all enemies both foreign and domestic by standing as Americans and upholding our end of the contract. Some of us have to renounce all other obligations to any other government and run our States of the Union as State Citizens, or the Constitutions collapse and are no longer contractually enforceable.

If one Party to a contract dies or otherwise is missing, the contract itself is subject to the remaining Party or Parties. This is called “The Last Man Standing Rule”. Thus, for the last 160 years while our American Government has been out of Session, our British and Municipal (Holy See) Subcontractors have been interpreting things however they liked.

You see the result.
Our public employees and their political parties have been doing whatever they like with the public assets and have contrived to lodge false claims of ownership and custodial interest against their employers and our assets, too.

Things began to unravel in 1998, when we appeared as The Last Man Standing on the American side of things.

We served Notice that the unincorporated Federation of States, our “Ship of State” in international affairs, is alive and well. Like Robinson Crusoe, we turned up at a most inconvenient moment in history and used the same “Last Man Standing Rule” to enforce the Federal Constitution for ourselves and our countrymen.

At the start, we had only two known verifiable native state citizens in each State of the Union standing with us.

Less than 200 Americans reported for duty to serve the Federation in 1998, but those few had established proper lineage and standing and right to act in their capacity as State Electors.

Today, there are thousands of Americans standing as Americans on their land and soil, as the true inheritors of this country, operating their State Assemblies in original jurisdiction — and because they are doing this difficult job, millions of other Americans are still protected under the Federal Constitutions.

So when people ask me about David Straight and his process, all based on Federal Code found at 8 USC 1101 (21) (a), I have to go back through all of this and explain Federal Dual Citizenship, and explain the “legal terms” being used in this snippet of Federal Code:

Here is it, term by term:
8 USC 1101 (21) (a):
The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
The links shown within the current 8 USC 1101 (21) above as found at Cornell University Law website define the terms: “national”
(21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
“person”

(3) The term “person” means an individual or an organization.
“permanent”

(31) The term “permanent” means a relationship of continuing or lasting nature, as distinguished from temporary, but a relationship may be permanent even though it is one that may be dissolved eventually at the instance either of the United States or of the individual, in accordance with law.

“State”
(36) The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. For those familiar with Federal-Speak the meaning of 8 USC 1101 (21) (a) is now perfectly clear. For others, not so much. So let’s go deeper —

The very fact that this citation is found in Federal Code means that it is meant to apply to Federal Persons, not Americans operating as members of the General Public. That is a given.

Second, throughout Federal Code, the word “person” is defined as a corporation whether an individual corporation or an organization like General Motors Company. Again, this applies only to such Federal “persons” and not to living people.

Third, the general representation of the word “state” can mean any kind of state — so we have to look at the specific meaning of “state” attached to this legislation and we find that, as expected, it applies to the unauthorized Territorial “States” —- all 57 of them, which are in fact Confederate States-of-States, none of which have standing as actual States.

Remember when President Obama referred to “all fifty-seven States” and people were aghast?

This is part of the confusion and deception that arises when the Federal Employees refer to “States-of-States” as [Confederate] “States” and count their [Confederate} “State” franchise corporations as if they were actual States of the Union.

So now you can see that David Straight’s process and this definition apply to Federal Persons, not to the American People, and that those following his advice do not recoup their birthright political status. They adopt a Dual political status as American State Nationals – U.S. Citizens instead.

There is nothing “wrong” with that status, but it is what it is, and people choosing it deserve to know what the pros and cons of such a political status are.

Yes, as American State Nationals, you do recoup your Constitutional protections, as long as the rest of us hold the line and populate the States and run the actual State Governments for you, but on the downside, you are also presumed to be loyal British Subjects and to serve as collateral for the Queen’s Government and to be obligated to obey the Queen’s laws and pay the Queen’s taxes.

In other words, you place yourself right back under the British Thumb when you follow David Straight’s process. You can do that, and nobody has any right to object — but you should at least know that up front and not believe that you are recouping your unencumbered birthright, instead.

Dual political status provisions, meant to allow Americans to serve in the Federal Government without loss of their Constitutional protections, have been so far warped and exploited that many members of the U.S. Congress now claim to be Dual Citizens of entirely different countries, subjecting themselves, for example, as citizens of Greece and Ireland, while serving as U.S. Congressmen.

This is obviously not why Federal Dual Citizenship exists and should not be allowed.

Dual political status invites conflicts of interest. No man can serve two Masters. Thus those who serve in the Federal Government, be it as a Territorial (military) or Municipal (civil service) employee, are forever caught between two worlds, or even possibly, three worlds, and obligated to serve all comers.

Our public employees have been famously referred to as “political whores” because they are under this unintended and unnatural obligation, and most of them do not know that in the absence of declaring and recording their chosen political status, they are presumed to be acting as both British Territorial U.S. Citizens and as Municipal citizens of the United States — and as such, have no Constitutional guarantees at all.

Seen from the perspective of many Federal Employees, David Straight’s process is a great improvement, as it restores their Constitutional Guarantees, but for Joe American it falls far short of providing his birthright guarantees, freedoms, and property rights.

This Notice is being issued as an International Notice because each and every State of the Union is being addressed along with all foreign Confederate States-of-States and all foreign governments worldwide.

This Notice provides information regarding continuing mischief by Officers of the Queen’s Government and those serving as elected officers of British Crown Corporations involved in this overall fraud scheme — all designed to trick Americans into accepting Federal Dual Citizenship or Federal Dual Political Status without full disclosure of the resulting contractual obligations.

We are informed that “millions” of Americans have “signed up” and adopted the Dual Political Status of American State National – U.S. Citizen, without full disclosure, and that under this circumstance, a protest must be lodged with the international community.

There is exactly one unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America since 1776, and that Federation representing the physically-defined States of the Union, is calling upon all Governments and Nations to recognize the predatory activities of commercial corporations in the business of providing governmental services, seeking to defraud people and unjustly enrich themselves by promoting undisclosed contracts, misrepresenting themselves and exercising unauthorized powers under color of law.

We specifically protest the practice of “conferring” or presuming citizenship obligations on people, issuing Executive Orders pertaining to corporate service providers as if they applied to the General Public, usurping upon the responsibilities allocated to our American Federal Service Provider by unauthorized Federal Personnel and their Agency Subcontractors, deceptive contracting processes, and misrepresenting the limitations of the powers entrusted to our Federal Subcontractors overall.

Notice issued by:
The United States of America (Unincorporated)
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

Other Article About David Straight

Article 3690. David Straight 2.0 — The British Back Door and Our Claims

Article 1805. More Corroboration — From David Straight

Article 3694. David Straight 3.0 — Think About This, Just Not Too Long

Article 3530- About David Straight Once and For All

Article 2022. More Nuggets — David Straight Seminar Afternoon

Article 3683. Reply to David Straight and Notice to the Generals 6.0

Article 2021. Morning Session with David Straight

Article 3613- Open Letter to David Straight — Or Astray

Article 3698. Straight Talk to David Straight